I have recently written several articles about my support for the Housing Rescue and Financial Bailout Package that is now weeks into effect.
I believe it is an important piece of Legislation that does 2 important key things to add support to the ailing housing and credit markets.
It creates badly need liquidity in the credit .
Opposition was strong in many camps arguing to block grants on the grounds that "the principal beneficiaries of this type of plan would be private lenders - who are now the owners of the vacant or foreclosed properties - instead of struggling homeowners who are working hard to stay in their homes."; Fear of the public mentioning the dreaded "bailout" is not something Republicans ever mention or want to hear.
I argued that this is not a Democratic issue or a Republican issue. This is an American issue. I believe that we could face a prolonged recession and economic crisis.
A scenario that that the Government needs to act quickly to avert.
Even Republican nominated Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson said about the theory of such a quick and strong move by the Federal Government is , "(the bill is) of a magnitude more important to turning the corner on the housing correction and supporting our markets and our economy".
Even more resounding statement came from Rep. John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, the minority leader who voted against the Bill, and "It's a bill that I cannot support.
However, It's a bill that the market clearly needs .."
However, I received a variety of criticism and backlash which as you know, I always welcome and encourage.
The main and understandable point of contention is what the ultimate cost to the good paying US Taxpayer.
Other detractors commented that the cost to the Treasury, and the American taxpayer, could reach a Trillion dollars .
The House of Representatives' Republican whip Roy Blunt objected to what he said would be "a 700-billion-dollar bailout of mortgage lenders, allowing them to offload their worst loans onto the Federal Housing Administration. " and stated unequivocally that he "believe rewarding, encouraging and reinforcing risky investments should not be the role of the government - and certainly shouldn't be financed by taxpayers," Blunt said.
There is little doubt that this legislation will be costly to taxpayers.
I agree it is not our responsibility to bailout business and consumers at every turn and for every decision that turns out unexpectedly.
However, I still believe this is more than a financial issue that could spiral to a National Crisis if the government fails to act. And I do believe the Government has some role in protecting our national interests personally and financially.
Events have transpired and conspired in an unprecedented way that no one could have imagined to cause a financial calamity. An economic disaster. A Financial ‘Perfect Storm".
The government must act.
However, the question is fair, "At What Cost??"
____________________________________________________________________________
Contact James Wexler (480) 221-8080 for all your Phoenix | Scottsdale area Real Estate needs
Related Posts


Yesterday, I wrote a blog titled Will the housing rescue Bill work ?

In many area of the country and in parts of Arizona water damage from floods are a serious issue. 


